Today is a Sabbath Day.

My Google play radio

This World Has An Attitude Problem

If God comes as a man to heal the sick, the blind, the dumb, and the deaf, and raise the dead back to life, God is rejected, tortured, and murdered. If God says, you will not see me for a while, people say he does not exist, or He is bad. So, God is always bad. If I were God why should I do something for those who reject me? What do you think of me? I am God remember?

I am writing my fourth book. It will be online 6 or 12 months from now. Below is the back cover:

My answer to the question: Why do creationists ignore all the evidence for evolution?

What evidence, fraudulent evidence? The question is based on a wrong premise that creationists ignore the evidence. Evidences have been examined by scientists and found them either fraudulent or weakening the evolution theory. It is just that the evidence for evolution do not logically make sense. On the contrary, it is the evolutionists who ignore how the theory crumbles when placed under the light of logical thought and observation.
Let us take as an example micro variation. It is believed by evolutionist that micro variation could extend to macro variation in billions of years. How is that an evidence to a scientific mind? It is only a belief not a fact. Billions of years cannot change biological laws of the present.
Natural selection? Natural selection is not evolution. It is a selection process of the already existing species.

Emergence of life out of non-living matter? There is a relentless propaganda especially in education that this has been proven in the laboratory. Here are the words of Dr. Stanley Miller himself: "Making amino acids is tricky, even in the laboratory. We know amino acids exist in some kinds of meteorites and interplanetary dust particles. When they rain down on a planet's surface, they import the possible building blocks of life, not necessarily life itself. Scientists think that along the way, there must have been a crucial step that turned atoms into organisms, but they still don't know what it is." See? They still do not know what it is. That means it is still a belief, not a fact. The Miller experiment did not produce life as propagandized in schools. If ever it produced life form, then it only proved that life forms can only emerge by intelligent design. The apparatus would not exist by itself without Urey and Miller.

Evolution is a belief that is winning in the minds of people because as in the words of Hitler, he said about the use of a lie so "colossal" that no one would believe that someone "could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously". No one would believe that scientist would do the same. Evolution is getting stronger because it is supported by a strong budget which is unfortunately coming from taxpayers pockets, including the pocket of those who do not believe in evolution.

The Proof of God

God has proved himself many times already. The question is whether the proof is recognized or not.

Solid evidence have been demonstrated from Adam and Eve up to the time the Son of God healed the sick and raised the dead back to life. But He was rejected, tortured and murdered for what He did because there was no business in it. He did it for free. So, God was fed up and had His Son say: “You will never see me again until you say blessed is he who comes in the name of the creator of the universe.” Here we are now. We cannot see Him because he gives in to our choice of not wanting to see Him. By solid evidence we refer to that which can be seen, or touched. God has withdrawn solid evidence of Him in accordance to our desire not see Him.

However, we still have the so called logical evidence. We do this in science all the time. The reasoning runs like this. Let us take the atom for example. No one has seen the atom and the sub-atomic particles. Their existence is only established by reasoning out of the observed effects on the medium and the condition set up for the experiment. To make the long story short, Rutherford conceptualized an atomic model with electrons surrounding the structure with a very tiny center he called the protons. The protons was assigned a positive charge to make sense on why the negative electrons should stay around, because unlike charges attract each other. There should be equal number of electrons and protons, but when the weight is calculated on this basis, the atom has excess weight. So, another sub-atomic particle named the neutron was proposed to account for the mass difference. Everything looked fine, but wait a minute. How are protons with the same charge gathered together at the very tiny center of the atoms. They repel each other because of their similar charges. So another particle had to be theorized to hold the protons together and it was named gluon, derived from the word glue. There were numerous number of sub-atomic particles theorized later but we can stop just here for our purpose of illustrating that something can be believed to exist by logical evidence.

Since God has withdrawn all solid evidence of Him, what is the logical evidence of His existence? The line of reasoning runs like this. A toothpick, as simple as it is has a designer and a creator. It is totally foolish and senseless to believe that a toothpick can come to exist by itself. Let us take a single living cell. It is countless times more complicated as a space lab. Who would ever think in his right mind that a single living cell can become existent by itself; or the atom the workings of which we do not fully understand; or the cosmos as huge and as exquisitely designed as it is. Applying the self existent concept to the things we do not fully comprehend is illogical and senseless.

Isaac Newton said: “He who thinks half-heartedly will not believe in God; but he who really thinks has to believe in God.” Max Planck said: “All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force... We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent Mind. This Mind is the matrix of all matter.” What more can I say? Nothing more.

Read Pablo Solutin's answer to What is your opinion about God having made a decision not to interfere in our lives? on Quora